Browsing by Author "Grimm, R."

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3

Open Access
A catalog of stream processing optimizations
(Association for Computing Machinery, 2014) Hirzel M.; Soulé R.; Schneider S.; Gedik, B.; Grimm, R.
Various research communities have independently arrived at stream processing as a programming model for efficient and parallel computing. These communities include digital signal processing, databases, operating systems, and complex event processing. Since each community faces applications with challenging performance requirements, each of them has developed some of the same optimizations, but often with conflicting terminology and unstated assumptions. This article presents a survey of optimizations for stream processing. It is aimed both at users who need to understand and guide the system's optimizer and at implementers who need to make engineering tradeoffs. To consolidate terminology, this article is organized as a catalog, in a style similar to catalogs of design patterns or refactorings. To make assumptions explicit and help understand tradeoffs, each optimization is presented with its safety constraints (when does it preserve correctness?) and a profitability experiment (when does it improve performance?). We hope that this survey will help future streaming system builders to stand on the shoulders of giants from not just their own community. © 2014 ACM.
Open Access
From a calculus to an execution environment for stream processing
(ACM, 2012) Soulé, R.; Hirzel, M.; Gedik, Buğra; Grimm, R.
At one level, this paper is about River, a virtual execution environment for stream processing. Stream processing is a paradigm well-suited for many modern data processing systems that ingest high-volume data streams from the real world, such as audio/video streaming, high-frequency trading, and security monitoring. One attractive property of stream processing is that it lends itself to parallelization on multicores, and even to distribution on clusters when extreme scale is required. Stream processing has been co-evolved by several communities, leading to diverse languages with similar core concepts. Providing a common execution environment reduces language development effort and increases portability. We designed River as a practical realization of Brooklet, a calculus for stream processing. So at another level, this paper is about a journey from theory (the calculus) to practice (the execution environment). The challenge is that, by definition, a calculus abstracts away all but the most central concepts. Hence, there are several research questions in concretizing the missing parts, not to mention a significant engineering effort in implementing them. But the effort is well worth it, because using a calculus as a foundation yields clear semantics and proven correctness results. Copyright © 2012 ACM.
Open Access
River: an intermediate language for stream processing
(John Wiley & Sons Ltd., 2016) Soulé R.; Hirzel M.; Gedik, B.; Grimm, R.
Summary This paper presents both a calculus for stream processing, named Brooklet, and its realization as an intermediate language, named River. Because River is based on Brooklet, it has a formal semantics that enables reasoning about the correctness of source translations and optimizations. River builds on Brooklet by addressing the real-world details that the calculus elides. We evaluated our system by implementing front-ends for three streaming languages, and three important optimizations, and a back-end for the System S distributed streaming runtime. Overall, we significantly lower the barrier to entry for new stream-processing languages and thus grow the ecosystem of this crucial style of programming.