Browsing by Author "Özturk, Özcan"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2

Open Access
Energy efficient boosting of GEMM accelerators for DNN via reuse
(Association for Computing Machinery, Inc, 2022-06-06) Cicek, Nihat Mert; Shen, Xipeng; Özturk, Özcan
Reuse-centric convolutional neural networks (CNN) acceleration speeds up CNN inference by reusing computations for similar neuron vectors in CNN’s input layer or activation maps. This new paradigm of optimizations is, however, largely limited by the overheads in neuron vector similarity detection, an important step in reuse-centric CNN. This article presents an in-depth exploration of architectural support for reuse-centric CNN. It addresses some major limitations of the state-of-the-art design and proposes a novel hardware accelerator that improves neuron vector similarity detection and reduces the energy consumption of reuse-centric CNN inference. The accelerator is implemented to support a wide variety of neural network settings with a banked memory subsystem. Design exploration is performed through RTL simulation and synthesis on an FPGA platform. When integrated into Eyeriss, the accelerator can potentially provide improvements up to 7.75× in performance. Furthermore, it can reduce the energy used for similarity detection up to 95.46%, and it can accelerate the convolutional layer up to 3.63× compared to the software-based implementation running on the CPU.
Open Access
Process variation aware thread mapping for chip multiprocessors
(IEEE, 2009-04) Hong, S.; Narayanan, S. H. K.; Kandemir, M.; Özturk, Özcan
With the increasing scaling of manufacturing technology, process variation is a phenomenon that has become more prevalent. As a result, in the context of Chip Multiprocessors (CMPs) for example, it is possible that identically-designed processor cores on the chip have non-identical peak frequencies and power consumptions. To cope with such a design, each processor can be assumed to run at the frequency of the slowest processor, resulting in wasted computational capability. This paper considers an alternate approach and proposes an algorithm that intelligently maps (and remaps) computations onto available processors so that each processor runs at its peak frequency. In other words, by dynamically changing the thread-to-processor mapping at runtime, our approach allows each processor to maximize its performance, rather than simply using chip-wide lowest frequency amongst all cores and highest cache latency. Experimental evidence shows that, as compared to a process variation agnostic thread mapping strategy, our proposed scheme achieves as much as 29% improvement in overall execution latency, average improvement being 13% over the benchmarks tested. We also demonstrate in this paper that our savings are consistent across different processor counts, latency maps, and latency distributions.With the increasing scaling of manufacturing technology, process variation is a phenomenon that has become more prevalent. As a result, in the context of Chip Multiprocessors (CMPs) for example, it is possible that identically-designed processor cores on the chip have non-identical peak frequencies and power consumptions. To cope with such a design, each processor can be assumed to run at the frequency of the slowest processor, resulting in wasted computational capability. This paper considers an alternate approach and proposes an algorithm that intelligently maps (and remaps) computations onto available processors so that each processor runs at its peak frequency. In other words, by dynamically changing the thread-to-processor mapping at runtime, our approach allows each processor to maximize its performance, rather than simply using chip-wide lowest frequency amongst all cores and highest cache latency. Experimental evidence shows that, as compared to a process variation agnostic thread mapping strategy, our proposed scheme achieves as much as 29% improvement in overall execution latency, average improvement being 13% over the benchmarks tested. We also demonstrate in this paper that our savings are consistent across different processor counts, latency maps, and latency distributions. © 2009 EDAA.