Reply to Schlothfeldt
dc.citation.epage | 120 | en_US |
dc.citation.issueNumber | 1 | en_US |
dc.citation.spage | 119 | en_US |
dc.citation.volumeNumber | 31 | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Steinvorth, U. | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-01-29T10:00:56Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-01-29T10:00:56Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2009 | en_US |
dc.department | Department of Philosophy | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Recognition is an important function of labour, as Schlothfeld claims, but only under given capitalist conditions. It is the very point of the introduction of basic income, if embedded in a suitable education system, that it would allow people to receive recognition from all kinds of activities they regard as meaningful rather than from stultifying wage labour. | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0171-5860 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11693/48475 | |
dc.language.iso | English | en_US |
dc.publisher | De Gruyter Oldenbourg | en_US |
dc.source.title | Analyse und Kritik | en_US |
dc.title | Reply to Schlothfeldt | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- Reply_to_Schlothfeldt.pdf
- Size:
- 62.13 KB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description:
- Full printable version
License bundle
1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
- Name:
- license.txt
- Size:
- 1.71 KB
- Format:
- Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
- Description: