Taming the boojum: Being theoretical about peculiarities of learning

Simple item page
buir.contributor.authorBowers, Robert Ian
buir.contributor.orcidBowers, Robert Ian | 0000-0002-5688-9174
dc.citation.epage440en_US
dc.citation.issueNumber3en_US
dc.citation.spage433en_US
dc.citation.volumeNumber50en_US
dc.contributor.authorBowers, Robert Ian
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-01T12:46:32Z
dc.date.available2023-03-01T12:46:32Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.departmentDepartment of Psychologyen_US
dc.description.abstractThe case of the “biological constraints” movement in mid-20th-century psychology provides a reminder of the weight of psychology’s reliance on theory and theory-driven methods. By 1980, a critical mass of demonstrations of the specifcity of learning had eroded faith in general-process approaches. A common reaction was to call for a biological orientation. However, this proved not as straightforward as it had seemed, and much of the ostensibly biological research that followed was atheoretical. The successes in this context were due to careful theoretical work by people who appreciated the aims of the involved sciences and the interdependence of the aims with methods. Michael Domjan slowed the feld’s haphazard rush into ostensible biological research, and rather urged adoption of principled biological approaches. In 1982, his positive recommendation was for comparative psychology to begin to live up to its name, and adopt principled comparative methods as practised in biology. Although lauded, few followed this recommendation. Indeed, even Domjan’s own subsequent research was mostly not comparative in the way he had described, but rather involved single species, guided by a behaviour systems approach. With reference to two major perspectives associated with Domjan—comparative methods and behaviour systems theory—I present Domjan’s challenge not as being to make our feld comparative per se, but to make it theoretical. This challenge remains current.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3758/s13420-022-00535-3en_US
dc.identifier.eissn1543-4508
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11693/112001
dc.language.isoEnglishen_US
dc.publisherPsychonomic Society, Inc.en_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://doi.org/10.3758/s13420-022-00535-3en_US
dc.source.titleLearning & Behavioren_US
dc.subjectBehavior systems
dc.subjectComparative method
dc.subjectConstraints on learning
dc.subjectTheory
dc.subjectPsychology-biology integration
dc.subjectMichael Domjan
dc.titleTaming the boojum: Being theoretical about peculiarities of learningen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Taming_the_boojum_Being_theoretical_about_peculiarities_of_learning.pdf
Size:
579.58 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.69 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download
Collections
Department of Psychology