Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorBilgin, Pınar
dc.contributor.authorGüven, Durukan
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-16T07:43:51Z
dc.date.available2021-09-16T07:43:51Z
dc.date.copyright2021-09
dc.date.issued2021-09
dc.date.submitted2021-09-15
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11693/76519
dc.descriptionCataloged from PDF version of article.en_US
dc.descriptionThesis (Master's): Bilkent University, Department of Political Science and Public Administration, İhsan Doğramacı Bilkent University, 2021.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (leaves 77-82).en_US
dc.description.abstractThis thesis adopts securitization theory to analyse the securitization of cyberspace governance in different parts of the world to understand how the securitization of cyberspace governance affects the right to privacy, because securitization and the right to privacy are intertwined. Every step taken by states regarding securitization has crucial impacts on the right to privacy either positive or negative manner. The thesis asks: “How do the USA, China, and Iceland securitize cyberspace governance, and what is the relationship between the securitization of cyberspace governance and the right to privacy in these countries?” To answer this question, the thesis analyzes the National Cybersecurity Strategies and Freedom on the Net reports that were published in the post-2015 period. The thesis observes a complicated relationship between the securitization of cyberspace governance and the right to privacy. What governments declare and the results of their actions in the securitization process can be inconsistent as in the US, can be consistent as in Iceland, and can be consistent and inconsistent at the same time as in China. According to the comparison of cases with each other, a free and not-free state can take non-democratic measures to secure cyberspace governance.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Durukan Güvenen_US
dc.format.extentix, 82 leaves ; 30 cm.en_US
dc.language.isoEnglishen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectSecuritization theoryen_US
dc.subjectCyberspace governanceen_US
dc.subjectThe right to privacyen_US
dc.titleSecuritization of cyberspace governance and the right to privacy: cases of the Us, China, and Icelanden_US
dc.title.alternativeSiber alan yönetişiminin güvenlikleştirilmesi ve gizlilik hakkı: ABD, Çin ve İzlanda örneğien_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.departmentDepartment of Political Science and Public Administrationen_US
dc.publisherBilkent Universityen_US
dc.description.degreeM.S.en_US
dc.identifier.itemidB153668


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record