Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKurdoğlu, Rasim Serdar
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-19T10:44:50Z
dc.date.available2021-02-19T10:44:50Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.issn0167-4544
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11693/75489
dc.description.abstractThis paper offers a novel situational approach to study organizational justice in which the proposed unit of analysis is managerial behavior manifested in argumentation rather than employee justice perceptions. The currently dominant theoretical framework in justice research, which is built on justice perceptions, neglects the unique features of organizational order and vulnerability of procedural justice perceptions. As the procedural justice concept belongs chiefly to a spontaneous market order under which the rule of law is made possible, it is inappropriate to transfer this concept to an organization in which the rule of authority is dominant. Therefore, except the limited legal domain in which managerial freedom is restrained by laws, procedural justice in organizations represents a mirage that can give rise to hypocritical managerial actions that can legitimate morally controversial outcomes via eristic tactics. In contrast, interactional justice is of great importance to organizations in that employees and organizations can ensure their rational economic exchanges without deception. However, current formulations of interactional justice often regard interactions as a palliative recipe designed to alleviate reactions to outcomes and not as a constituent of distributive justice. Perelman’s argumentation theory can offer a new conceptualization of interactional justice that addresses this gap.en_US
dc.language.isoEnglishen_US
dc.source.titleJournal of Business Ethicsen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04166-zen_US
dc.subjectArgumentation theoryen_US
dc.subjectOrganizational justiceen_US
dc.subjectProcedural justiceen_US
dc.subjectInteractional justiceen_US
dc.subjectLegitimacyen_US
dc.subjectHayeken_US
dc.titleThe mirage of procedural justice and the primacy of interactional justice in organizationsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.departmentDepartment of Managementen_US
dc.citation.spage495en_US
dc.citation.epage512en_US
dc.citation.volumeNumber167en_US
dc.citation.issueNumber3en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10551-019-04166-zen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.contributor.bilkentauthorKurdoğlu, Rasim Serdar


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record