Tertiary level EFL students’ perceptions regarding the use of Edmodo, Quizlet, and Canva within technology acceptance model (Tam)

Date

2020-06

Editor(s)

Advisor

Peker, Hilal

Supervisor

Co-Advisor

Co-Supervisor

Instructor

Source Title

Print ISSN

Electronic ISSN

Publisher

Volume

Issue

Pages

Language

English

Type

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Attention Stats
Usage Stats
34
views
687
downloads

Series

Abstract

The purpose of this quantitative study was to examine tertiary level EFL learners’ perceptions on the use of the Web 2.0 tools (i.e. Edmodo, Quizlet, Canva). This study was conducted with 90 participants at an English language preparatory school of a state university in Turkey. The results indicated that lower level students reported more positive opinions pertaining the use of the tools individually or altogether when compared to higher level students. The participants significantly differed from one another in terms of their perceptions of the awareness and actual system usage of the tools. It was also found that the perceptions of the awareness could slightly and the perceptions of the actual system usage of the Web 2.0 tools could moderately predict the perceptions of the perceived usefulness of the tools. The implications of this study indicate that these already repeatedly used tools as a curricular task could be substituted or replaced with other tools to alleviate the oversaturation and reluctance of the use of the Web 2.0 tools by learners. Also, their opinions could also be taken into consideration when choosing which Web 2.0 tools to be implemented into language laboratory lessons so that their perceptions on the perceived usefulness, awareness and actual system usage of the tools could be positively shaped. Further research is required in the literature to give more support to generalize the results.

Course

Other identifiers

Book Title

Degree Discipline

Teaching English as a Foreign Language

Degree Level

Master's

Degree Name

MA (Master of Arts)

Citation

Published Version (Please cite this version)