Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorWringe, William Gilesen_US
dc.contributor.authorBoğa, Dilaraen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-06-12T11:28:09Z
dc.date.available2019-06-12T11:28:09Z
dc.date.copyright2019-05
dc.date.issued2019-06
dc.date.submitted2019-06-11
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11693/52019
dc.descriptionCataloged from PDF version of article.en_US
dc.descriptionThesis (M.S.): Bilkent University, Department of Philosophy, İhsan Doğramacı Bilkent University, 2019.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (leaves 47-50).en_US
dc.description.abstractThe ‘Responsibility Dilemma’ is a significant issue for Just War Theory. The dilemma deals with the question of how to explain why non-combatants are not liable for lethal defensive harms despite being blameworthy. In this thesis, I suggest that we can overcome this dilemma by recognizing armies as corporate agents who bear liability. This explains why armies are liable, and why civilians are not. I also claim that there is a distinction between liability and blameworthiness.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Dilara Boğaen_US
dc.format.extentiv, 50 leaves ; 30 cm.en_US
dc.language.isoEnglishen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectEthics of waren_US
dc.subjectResponsibility dilemmaen_US
dc.subjectSeth Lazaren_US
dc.subjectCollective agencyen_US
dc.subjectMoral liabilityen_US
dc.titleArmies as corporate agents: a new response to Lazar’s ‘responsibility dilemma’en_US
dc.title.alternativeKurumsal failler olarak ordular: Lazar’ın ‘sorumluluk ikilemi’’ne yeni bir yanıten_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.departmentDepartment of Philosophyen_US
dc.publisherBilkent Universityen_US
dc.description.degreeM.S.en_US
dc.identifier.itemidB156534


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record