Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGürkaynak, G.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKoz, Ç.en_US
dc.contributor.authorTopaloğlu, S. N.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-21T16:10:05Z
dc.date.available2019-02-21T16:10:05Z
dc.date.issued2018en_US
dc.identifier.issn1773-9578
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11693/50490
dc.description.abstractThe final destination and the ultimate goal that we put forth in our article is that the Turkish Competition Board should include innovation considerations in its merger control analyses by employing dynamic tools. Accordingly, we contend that the Turkish Competition Board should “set its course to Ithaka” and aim to reach its “ideal state” in its enforcement of competition rules. The Turkish Competition Board should bear in mind that, regardless of how long, arduous and full of hardship the journey may be, each step taken on this path brings it closer to Ithaka and helps it to achieve the fundamental goals of competition enforcement. Without undertaking this adventurous, challenging and lengthy voyage,it is not possible to reach the final destination.
dc.language.isoEnglish
dc.source.titleConcurrencesen_US
dc.subjectCompetition policyen_US
dc.subjectEconomic analysisen_US
dc.subjectEconomic efficiencyen_US
dc.subjectInternationalen_US
dc.subjectMerger clearance (Phase I)en_US
dc.subjectMerger clearance (Phase II)en_US
dc.subjectTurkeyen_US
dc.titleTurkey: dynamic efficiency considerations in merger control analysesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.departmentDepartment of Lawen_US
dc.citation.spage1en_US
dc.citation.epage6en_US
dc.citation.volumeNumber2018en_US
dc.citation.issueNumber3en_US
dc.publisherInstitute of Competition Law


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record