Widening the world of IR: a typology of homegrown theorizing

Date
2018
Editor(s)
Advisor
Supervisor
Co-Advisor
Co-Supervisor
Instructor
Source Title
All Azimuth : A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace
Print ISSN
2146-7757
Electronic ISSN
Publisher
Center for Foreign Policy and Peace Research, İhsan Doğramacı Peace Foundation
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
45 - 68
Language
English
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Series
Abstract

It is rare that a recognized voice from non-Western world makes an impression in International Relations theory. While a few studies have looked at the structural and institutional constraints that contribute to such lack of recognition, part of the problem stems from confusion around the definition of what theorizing out of the non-Western world actually is. Based on a review of studies that embody indigenous conceptualizations of international phenomena in the periphery, we first define such 'homegrown' theorizing as original theorizing in the periphery about the periphery. By elaborating on these conceptualizations' specific methods in building theories, we then provide a typology of homegrown theories and assess each theory building method in terms of its potential for global acceptance and further development. We substantiate our arguments on global acceptance by drawing on a comparison of the citation counts of 18 homegrown theories. In doing so, we try to give voice to some of the most prominent scholarly and intellectual efforts stemming from the periphery, and provide a guide for Western scholars on how to engage with homegrown theorizing in a more intellectually stimulating manner. The article concludes by highlighting a number of critical factors in opening up space for different voices in the world of IR.

Course
Other identifiers
Book Title
Citation
Published Version (Please cite this version)