Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKeven, N.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-04T11:00:41Z
dc.date.available2019-02-04T11:00:41Z
dc.date.issued2017en_US
dc.identifier.issn0140-525X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11693/48791
dc.description.abstractIn our target article, we argued that the positive results of neonatal imitation are likely to be by-products of normal aerodigestive development. Our hypothesis elicited various responses on the role of social interaction in infancy, the methodological issues about imitation experiments and the relation between the aerodigestive theory and the development of speech. Here we respond to the commentaries.en_US
dc.language.isoEnglishen_US
dc.source.titleBehavioral and Brain Sciencesen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X17001923en_US
dc.subjectPsychologyen_US
dc.subjectLife sciencesen_US
dc.titleBeyond neonatal imitation: aerodigestive stereotypies, speech development, and social interaction in the extended perinatal perioden_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.departmentDepartment of Philosophyen_US
dc.citation.spage1en_US
dc.citation.epage14en_US
dc.citation.volumeNumber40en_US
dc.citation.issueNumbere403en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/S0140525X17001923en_US
dc.publisherCambridge University Pressen_US
dc.identifier.eissn1469-1825


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record