dc.contributor.author | Bilgin, P. | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-01-23T16:51:13Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-01-23T16:51:13Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2015-09-02 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 2162-4887 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11693/48295 | |
dc.description.abstract | Anthony Burke’s ‘security cosmopolitanism’ is a fresh and thought-provoking contribution to critical theorizing about security. In this discussion piece, I would like to join Burke’s call for ‘security cosmopolitanism’ by way of arguing against ‘security communitarianism’. I understand the latter as a particular approach that seeks to limit the scope of security to one’s community – be it the ‘nation-state’ or ‘civilization’. I will suggest that arguing against ‘security communitarianism’ requires paying further attention to the postcolonial critique of cosmopolitanism. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | English | en_US |
dc.source.title | Critical Studies on Security | en_US |
dc.relation.isversionof | https://doi.org/10.1080/21624887.2015.1065117 | en_US |
dc.subject | Security | en_US |
dc.subject | Cosmopolitanism | en_US |
dc.subject | Postcolonial | en_US |
dc.subject | Critical security studies | en_US |
dc.title | Arguing against security communitarianism | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.department | Department of International Relations | en_US |
dc.citation.spage | 176 | en_US |
dc.citation.epage | 181 | en_US |
dc.citation.volumeNumber | 3 | en_US |
dc.citation.issueNumber | 2 | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/21624887.2015.1065117 | en_US |
dc.publisher | Routledge | en_US |
dc.identifier.eissn | 2162-4909 | |