Reciprocal influences of interpretation and attentional biases to health-related information
Author
Elhamiasl, Mina
Advisor
Boyacı, Hüseyin
Date
2018-10Publisher
Bilkent University
Language
en_US
Type
ThesisItem Usage Stats
150
views
views
43
downloads
downloads
Abstract
Cognitive processing biases to health-related information have been endorsed to
be present in patients who are su ering from medical diseases. Attentional bias is
one of the cognitive processes which facilitates the detection of health-threatening
information. Interpretation bias is the other cognitive mechanism that makes patients
attribute catastrophic meanings to ambiguous bodily sensations. Despite
the literature demonstrating that attentional and interpretation biases increase
negative emotions and challenge patients for adaptation to their health condition,
the link between these two biases has remained unclear. While some theories
claim that attentional and interpretation biases are interrelated, some state
that they might be orthogonal components of cognitive processing. Therefore,
this thesis aimed to investigate the relationship between interpretation and attentional
biases to health-related information by modifying interpretation bias
and studying its e ect on attentional bias.
One hundred undergraduate students who lacked any medical or psychological
problems were randomly allocated to Main-Modi cation or Placebo-Modi cation
groups. All participants were asked to complete a battery of questionnaire including
health anxiety inventory, Beck depression inventory, and Beck anxiety inventory
in order to control between-group di erences regarding these constructs. As
the pre-modi cation assessment, participants' interpretation and attentional biases
to health-related information were respectively measured using the Modi ed
Version of Online Interpretation Bias and Dot-probe tasks. Then, the Main-
Modi cation group underwent Main On-line Negative Interpretation Bias Modi-
cation Task aimed to impose unsafe and threatening interpretations for ambiguous
health-related scenarios. The Placebo-modi cation group completed Placebo
On-line Negative Interpretation Bias Modi cation Task. The modi cation phase
was followed by post-modi cation measurements.
Results revealed that the participants in the Main-Modi cation group experienced
more post-test interpretation bias indexed by Unsafe valence of interpretations
for ambiguous health-related situations compared to the Placebo group.
The Post-test between-group di erence, however, was not signi cant for interpretation
bias indexed by reaction time. Main negative interpretation bias modi
cation succeeded to amplify attentional bias toward Ambiguous images in the
Main group but Placebo modi cation did not do so. Unlike Placebo modi cation,
Main modi cation increased attentional bias to Health-Related images as well.
However, this increase was not statistically signi cant.
These results can be considered as the pieces of evidence endorsing the idea that
interpretation and attentional biases are interrelated aspects of cognitive processing.
Repeated exposure to negative interpretations for health-related situations
might increase patients' accessibility to negative meanings for interpreting further
ambiguous health-related situations. In turn, the new negative meanings might
facilitate detection of ambiguous bodily sensations or another health-related information
known as attentional bias.
Keywords
Interpretation BiasAttentional Bias
Cognitive Processing
Cognitive Processing Modi cation
Health