Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNalbantoglu, G. B.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-04-12T13:52:04Zen_US
dc.date.available2018-04-12T13:52:04Zen_US
dc.date.issued2000en_US
dc.identifier.issn1046-4883en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11693/38270en_US
dc.description.abstractFamiliar binary categories of architecture such as Western/regional, high style/vernacular and modern/primitive are crucial in guarding its disciplinary boundaries. In the first part of my article, by analyzing a number of paradigmatic architectural texts, I argue that notions of lack and excess are instrumental in maintaining the largely superimposed binary constructions of West/non-West and architecture/nonarchitecture. Then, through a particular reading of a non-Western site, I explore ways of rethinking the categories of architecture and non-Western beyond such binary oppositions.en_US
dc.language.isoEnglishen_US
dc.source.titleJournal of Architectural Educationen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://doi.org/10.1162/104648800564699en_US
dc.titleBeyond lack and excess: other architectures/other landscapesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.departmentDepartment of Interior Architecture and Environmental Designen_US
dc.citation.spage20en_US
dc.citation.epage27en_US
dc.citation.volumeNumber54en_US
dc.citation.issueNumber1en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1162/104648800564699en_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francisen_US
dc.identifier.eissn1531-314Xen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record