• About
  • Policies
  • What is openaccess
  • Library
  • Contact
Advanced search
      View Item 
      •   BUIR Home
      • University Library
      • Bilkent Theses
      • Theses - Department of Political Science and Public Administration
      • Dept. of Political Science and Public Administration - Ph.D. / Sc.D.
      • View Item
      •   BUIR Home
      • University Library
      • Bilkent Theses
      • Theses - Department of Political Science and Public Administration
      • Dept. of Political Science and Public Administration - Ph.D. / Sc.D.
      • View Item
      JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

      Searching for power-sharing arrangements in the resolution of ethnic conflicts : the case of Kurdish conflict in Turkey

      Thumbnail
      Embargo Lift Date: 2020-09-28
      View / Download
      2.8 Mb
      Author
      Fazlıoğlu, Ömer
      Advisor
      Sarıgil, Zeki
      Date
      2017-09
      Publisher
      Bilkent University
      Language
      English
      Type
      Thesis
      Item Usage Stats
      138
      views
      27
      downloads
      Abstract
      Utilizing mixed-method design and multiple data sources (primarily three nationwide public opinion surveys and 113 semi-structured elite interviews), this study examines the power-sharing perspectives in the context of Turkey's Kurdish conflict. It raises two main sets of questions at both elite and mass levels: Who and to what extent does support power sharing arrangements in a multi-ethnic country? Which factors can explain the variance in ethnic group members’ and ethno-political elites’ varying support for power-sharing arrangements? This study shows that Turks and Kurds’ understandings of and interest-formulations with regard to the power-sharing remain irreconcilable both at the mass and elite levels. At the mass-level, the Turks' opposition to the Kurds' ever-growing power-sharing demands remain strong and constant across years. Regarding Kurdish mass support for power sharing, the findings of the multivariate analyses support the main propositions of the grievance theory, whereas they disprove the merits of ‘Muslim brotherhood’ – i.e., sharing an overarching religious identity - and socio-economic approaches. At the elite level, the Kurdish elites remain divided in terms of their outlook to the power-sharing arrangements due to their competing interest-formulations. Challenging the unitary actor assumption of the power-sharing theory, this study advocates that the devolution of power creates winners and losers within the peripheral ethnic groups and, thereby fosters intra-ethnic infighting. This thesis proposes a bi-dimensional re-formulation of power-sharing as a conflict-management tool: vertical dimension, overhauling the power structure between the central government and peripheral groups; and horizontal dimension, regulating the power structure between competing co-ethnic segments within the peripheral group. This thesis concludes that under current conditions power-sharing governance remains infeasible in the resolution of the Turkey's Kurdish conflict.
      Keywords
      Ethnic Conflict
      Ethnic Infighting
      Kurdish Problem
      Power-Sharing
      Religion
      Permalink
      http://hdl.handle.net/11693/33770
      Collections
      • Dept. of Political Science and Public Administration - Ph.D. / Sc.D. 100
      Show full item record

      Browse

      All of BUIRCommunities & CollectionsTitlesAuthorsAdvisorsBy Issue DateKeywordsTypeDepartmentsThis CollectionTitlesAuthorsAdvisorsBy Issue DateKeywordsTypeDepartments

      My Account

      Login

      Statistics

      View Usage StatisticsView Google Analytics Statistics

      Bilkent University

      If you have trouble accessing this page and need to request an alternate format, contact the site administrator. Phone: (312) 290 1771
      © Bilkent University - Library IT

      Contact Us | Send Feedback | Off-Campus Access | Admin | Privacy