Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorBilgin, Pınaren_US
dc.contributor.authorGürpınar, Nigarhanen_US
dc.date.accessioned2016-09-30T13:49:53Z
dc.date.available2016-09-30T13:49:53Z
dc.date.copyright2016-09
dc.date.issued2016-09
dc.date.submitted2016-09-29
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11693/32380
dc.descriptionCataloged from PDF version of article.en_US
dc.descriptionThesis (M.S.): Bilkent University, Department of International Relations, İhsan Doğramacı Bilkent University, 2016.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (leaves 102-105).en_US
dc.description.abstractThe end of the Cold War created a contextual change in security studies along with a proliferation of scientific research revealing the pressing impacts of human activities on the environment since the beginning of the Industrial Revolution. Since then environmental security has been increasingly studied in different ways: as a new field of analysis, as a referent object or a security threat. Recent initiatives like the 2015 UN Climate Conference COP 21 and more frequent and more powerful environmental disasters such as hurricanes, droughts and famines attracted even more scholarly attention for environmental security studies. This thesis specifically aims to assess the contributions and limitations of the Aberystwyth School and the Copenhagen School for the analysis of environmental security. As a result, the Aberystwyth School broadens the research agenda by allowing room for the analysis of different environmental problems experienced by various referents. The school offers bringing about progress and change in the meaning and making of security through politicization and emancipation. However, the cases fall short demonstrating how to reach emancipation at the global level. The Copenhagen School shows how securitization process works and reveals how this process attracts attention, measure, policies and resources to environmental concerns. G ’ f x d understanding of construction of security through urgency, speech acts and state elites, limits the analytical strength of the Copenhagen School for the environmental security analysis.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Nigarhan Gürpınar.en_US
dc.format.extentxii, 105 leaves.en_US
dc.language.isoEnglishen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectAberystwyth Schoolen_US
dc.subjectCopenhagen Schoolen_US
dc.subjectCritical Security Studiesen_US
dc.subjectEnvironmenten_US
dc.subjectSecurity.en_US
dc.titleAn assessment of the contributions and limitations of the Aberystwyth school and the Copenhagen school for the analysis of environmental securityen_US
dc.title.alternativeÇevre güvenliği analizinde Aberystwyth okulu ve Kopenhag okulu katkıları ve kısıtlamalarının bir değerlenirmesien_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.departmentDepartment of International Relationsen_US
dc.publisherBilkent Universityen_US
dc.description.degreeM.S.en_US
dc.identifier.itemidB154160
dc.embargo.release2018-09-01


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record