| dc.description.abstract | This study aims to contribute readings of arguments pertaining to and
conceptualizations of the experience of boredom to discussions of art, philosophy and
culture. Relevant histories and readings of philosophical accounts of boredom are
considered in order to enable an understanding of boredom as generative of distinctive
understandings of space. This is further developed as an account of boredom as
problematic in the reception and creation of literary and visual art. Beginning from critical
discussions of boredom in recent cultural and critical commentary, in particular discussions
of the everyday, this thesis considers the phenomenological analysis of the everyday that is
at work in Martin Heidegger’s account of boredom and in rewritings of this analysis, as the
experience of the impersonal, in texts by Maurice Blanchot and Emmanuel Levinas.
Boredom is shown to provoke an ambivalence that can nevertheless unfold, or produce,
spaces of thought, art and the everyday through the experience of the impersonal. The
limits of these spaces of boredom invite us to certain passages through experiences of
ambivalence where thought, art and the everyday are opened up, by means of an
imagination of boredom, to new possibilities. | en_US |
