• About
  • Policies
  • What is open access
  • Library
  • Contact
Advanced search
      View Item 
      •   BUIR Home
      • University Library
      • Bilkent Theses
      • Theses - Department of Industrial Engineering
      • Dept. of Industrial Engineering - Master's degree
      • View Item
      •   BUIR Home
      • University Library
      • Bilkent Theses
      • Theses - Department of Industrial Engineering
      • Dept. of Industrial Engineering - Master's degree
      • View Item
      JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

      Analysis of variance reduction techniques in various systems

      Thumbnail
      View / Download
      6.1 Mb
      Author(s)
      Çelik, Sabri
      Advisor
      Sabuncuoğlu, İhsan
      Date
      2003
      Publisher
      Bilkent University
      Language
      English
      Type
      Thesis
      Item Usage Stats
      167
      views
      136
      downloads
      Abstract
      In this thesis, we consider four different Variance Reduction Techniques (VRTs): Antithetic Variates (AV), Latin Hypercube Sampling (LHS), Control Variates (CV), and Poststratified Sampling (PS). These methods individually or in combination are applied to the steady state simulation of three well-studied systems. These systems are M/M/1 Queuing System, a Serial Line Production System, and an (s,S) Inventory Policy. Our results indicate that there is no guarantee of a reduction in variance or an improvement in precision in estimates. The performance of VRTs totally depends on the system characteristics. Nevertheless, CV performs better than PS, AV and LHS on the average. Therefore, instead of altering the input part of the simulation, extracting more information by CV should be more effective. However, if any extra information about the system is not available, AV or LHS can be favored since they do not require additional knowledge about the system. Furthermore, since the analysis of output data through CV or PS requires a negligible time compared to the simulation run time, applying CV and PS at all possible cases and then selecting the best one can be the best strategy in the variance reduction. The use of the combination of methods provides more improvement on the average.
      Keywords
      Simulation
      Variance Reduction Techniques
      Output Data Analysis
      Antithetic Variates
      Latin Hypercube Sampling
      Control Variates
      Poststratified Sampling
      Permalink
      http://hdl.handle.net/11693/29255
      Collections
      • Dept. of Industrial Engineering - Master's degree 355
      Show full item record

      Browse

      All of BUIRCommunities & CollectionsTitlesAuthorsAdvisorsBy Issue DateKeywordsTypeDepartmentsCoursesThis CollectionTitlesAuthorsAdvisorsBy Issue DateKeywordsTypeDepartmentsCourses

      My Account

      Login

      Statistics

      View Usage StatisticsView Google Analytics Statistics

      Bilkent University

      If you have trouble accessing this page and need to request an alternate format, contact the site administrator. Phone: (312) 290 2976
      © Bilkent University - Library IT

      Contact Us | Send Feedback | Off-Campus Access | Admin | Privacy