• About
  • Policies
  • What is openaccess
  • Library
  • Contact
Advanced search
      View Item 
      •   BUIR Home
      • University Library
      • Bilkent Theses
      • Theses - Department of Psychology
      • Dept.of Psychology - Master's degree
      • View Item
      •   BUIR Home
      • University Library
      • Bilkent Theses
      • Theses - Department of Psychology
      • Dept.of Psychology - Master's degree
      • View Item
      JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

      Does distance affect memory predictions by activating beliefs about perceptual fluency

      Thumbnail
      View/Open
      Full printable version (880.6Kb)
      Author
      Elibüyük, Esra
      Advisor
      Besken, Miri
      Date
      2016-06
      Publisher
      Bilkent University
      Language
      English
      Type
      Thesis
      Metadata
      Show full item record
      Please cite this item using this persistent URL
      http://hdl.handle.net/11693/29139
      Abstract
      People predict their future memory performance to be better for the perceptually fluent stimuli than for the disfluent ones. For instance, their memory confidence is higher for the words written in large fonts than small fonts (Rhodes and Castel, 2008). This effect was previously believed to stem from experiential difficulty in encoding of the disfluent stimuli. However, a recent study showed that, one’s beliefs and theories, rather than experiential difficulty, make the major contribution to the effect of perceptual fluency on people’s memory predictions (Mueller, Dunlosky, Tauber and Rhodes, 2014). The close relationship between spatial distance and perceptual fluency increases the likelihood that spatial distance affects people’s memory predictions in the absence of experiential difficulty. The present study investigated the effect of perceived spatial distance on people’s judgments of learning (JOLs) and actual memory performance in two experiments. The perceived spatial distance of stimuli was manipulated by showing the stimuli at either top or bottom positions on a scene with depth perspective. At the same time, the depth cue was expected to produce physical size illusion enabling comparing the effects of perceived spatial distance and perceived size on JOLs. Results revealed no effect of perceived spatial distance or perceived size on JOLs and memory performance when tested with words (Experiment 1) or objects (Experiment 2). The null results for perceived size and JOLs were believed to stem from the size differences within the stimuli.
      Collections
      • Dept.of Psychology - Master's degree 13

      Browse

      All of BUIRCommunities & CollectionsTitlesAuthorsAdvisorsBy Issue DateKeywordsTypeDepartmentsThis CollectionTitlesAuthorsAdvisorsBy Issue DateKeywordsTypeDepartments

      My Account

      Login

      Statistics

      View Usage Statistics

      Bilkent University

      If you have trouble accessing this page and need to request an alternate format, contact the webmaster. Phone: (312) 290 1771
      Copyright © Bilkent University | Library IT

      Contact Us | Send Feedback | Off-Campus Access | Admin