Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorLewis, David M. G.
dc.contributor.authorYılmaz, Cansu
dc.date.accessioned2016-05-24T14:02:45Z
dc.date.available2016-05-24T14:02:45Z
dc.date.copyright2016-05
dc.date.issued2016-05
dc.date.submitted2016-05-20
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11693/29107
dc.descriptionCataloged from PDF version of thesis.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (leaves 59-64).en_US
dc.descriptionThesis (M.S.): Bilkent University, Department of Psychology, İhsan Doğramacı Bilkent University, 2016.en_US
dc.description.abstractThe current thesis investigated the hypothesis that evolved psychological mechanisms producing adult attachment strategies are sensitive to personal and contextual inputs linked to costs and benefits of alternative attachment strategies. Three studies were designed to 1) identify the link between the inputs “early parental environment, speed of life, and mate value” and attachment strategies; 2) examine temporary activation of adult attachment mechanisms in response to a blind date opportunity with individuals varying in physical attractiveness; and 3) test the relationship between physical attractiveness and secure base use behavior in couples experimentally manipulating physical attractiveness. Study 1 results showed adult attachment mechanisms up-regulated both men’s and women’s attachment anxiety in response to low mate value and low quality early parental environment; men’s attachment avoidance in response to fast life speed and low quality early parental environment; women’s attachment avoidance in response to fast life speed and low mate value. Study 2 results showed both men and women exhibited an anxious attachment strategy in response to a blind date opportunity with an individual of high physical attractiveness whereas only women exhibited an avoidant strategy in response to a blind date opportunity with an individual of average physical attractiveness. Study 3 results revealed a positive correlation between women’s ratings of facial attractiveness and secure base use scores; between individuals’ physical attractiveness and their secure base scores specifically among individuals who compared themselves to attractive others. These results enhance the understanding of the origins of individual differences in adult romantic attachment.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Cansu Yılmaz.en_US
dc.format.extentxi, 97 leaves : portraits (some color)en_US
dc.language.isoEnglishen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectAdult attachmenten_US
dc.subjectIndividual differencesen_US
dc.subjectPhysical attractivenessen_US
dc.titleThe origins of individual differences in romantic attachment: evolutionary psychological insightsen_US
dc.title.alternativeRomantik bağlanmada görülen kişisel farklılıkların kökenleri: evrimsel psikoloji yaklaşımıen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.departmentDepartment of Psychologyen_US
dc.publisherBilkent Universityen_US
dc.description.degreeM.A.en_US
dc.identifier.itemidB153297


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record