Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTekinerdogan, B.en_US
dc.contributor.authorÖztürk, K.en_US
dc.contributor.authorDoğru, A.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2016-02-08T12:18:46Z
dc.date.available2016-02-08T12:18:46Z
dc.date.issued2011en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11693/28371
dc.description.abstractIn general, a common reference architecture can be derived for Software as a Service (SaaS). However, while designing particular applications one may derive various application design alternatives from the same reference SaaS architecture specification. To meet the required functional and nonfunctional requirements of different enterprise applications it is important to model the possible design so that a feasible alternative can be defined. In this paper, we propose a systematic approach and corresponding tool support for guiding the design of SaaS application architectures. The approach defines a SaaS reference architecture, a family feature model and a set of reference design rules. Based on the business requirements an application feature model is defined using the family feature model. Selected features are related to design decisions and a SaaS application architecture design is derived. © 2011 IEEE.en_US
dc.language.isoEnglishen_US
dc.source.titleProceedings - 9th Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture, WICSA 2011en_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1109/WICSA.2011.49en_US
dc.subjectDesign guidelinesen_US
dc.subjectSaaS architecture designen_US
dc.subjectSaaS tool supporten_US
dc.subjectApplication architectureen_US
dc.subjectApplication designen_US
dc.subjectArchitecture specificationen_US
dc.subjectBusiness requirementen_US
dc.subjectDesign decisionsen_US
dc.subjectDesign guidelinesen_US
dc.subjectEnterprise applicationsen_US
dc.subjectFeasible alternativesen_US
dc.subjectFeature modelsen_US
dc.subjectNon-functional requirementsen_US
dc.subjectReasoning about design alternativesen_US
dc.subjectReference architectureen_US
dc.subjectReference designsen_US
dc.subjectSaaS architecture designen_US
dc.subjectSaaS tool supporten_US
dc.subjectSoftware as a serviceen_US
dc.subjectTool supporten_US
dc.subjectDesignen_US
dc.subjectWeb servicesen_US
dc.subjectSoftware architectureen_US
dc.titleModeling and reasoning about design alternatives of software as a service architecturesen_US
dc.typeConference Paperen_US
dc.departmentDepartment of Computer Engineering
dc.citation.spage312en_US
dc.citation.epage319en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1109/WICSA.2011.49en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record