Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTunç, Gökhanen_US
dc.date.accessioned2016-02-08T10:12:10Z
dc.date.available2016-02-08T10:12:10Z
dc.date.issued2007en_US
dc.identifier.issn1300-3984
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11693/23324
dc.description.abstractWhether they are nationalist, socialist, humanist, Alevi or Sunni, a great many writers embrace and adopt Yunus Emre's views; they look upon him as a representative of their own opinions and make of the poet a historical figure legitimating these opinions. With regard to this status attributed to Yunus Emre, certain questions such as the following emerge: Is the poet indeed a representative of one or all of the perspectives? If not, why do writers of many different stances ascribe to Yunus Emre such a function? A satisfactory answer to these specific questions requires the evaluation of the poet and his works in terms of the notion "fakelore". To this end, this article, wherein the views of Richard M. Dorson, Alan Dundes, Eric Hobsbawn and Terence Ranger on fakelore and on the invention of tradition will be taken into consideration, aims at the analysis of the fakeloric status of Yunus Emre.en_US
dc.language.isoTurkishen_US
dc.source.titleMilli Folkloren_US
dc.subjectAlevien_US
dc.subjectFakeloreen_US
dc.subjectHumanisten_US
dc.subjectNationalisten_US
dc.subjectSocialisten_US
dc.subjectSunnien_US
dc.titleThe evaluation of Yunus Emre in the notion of fakeloreen_US
dc.title.alternativeFakelore kavrami merkezinde Yunus Emreen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.departmentDepartment of Turkish Literatureen_US
dc.citation.spage17en_US
dc.citation.epage23en_US
dc.citation.volumeNumber10en_US
dc.citation.issueNumber75en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record