• About
  • Policies
  • What is openaccess
  • Library
  • Contact
Advanced search
      View Item 
      •   BUIR Home
      • Scholarly Publications
      • Faculty of Economics, Administrative And Social Sciences
      • Department of Political Science and Public Administration
      • View Item
      •   BUIR Home
      • Scholarly Publications
      • Faculty of Economics, Administrative And Social Sciences
      • Department of Political Science and Public Administration
      • View Item
      JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

      Global disorder and the limits of 'dialogue'

      Thumbnail
      View / Download
      289.8 Kb
      Author
      Salt, J.
      Date
      2008
      Source Title
      Third World Quarterly
      Print ISSN
      0143-6597
      Electronic ISSN
      1360-2241
      Publisher
      Routledge
      Volume
      29
      Issue
      4
      Pages
      691 - 710
      Language
      English
      Type
      Article
      Item Usage Stats
      64
      views
      53
      downloads
      Metadata
      Show full item record
      Abstract
      Since 2001 (designated as the UN Year of Dialogue Among Civilisations) several initiatives have been developed as a means of resolving problems whose causes have been ascribed, primarily by Samuel Huntington and Bernard Lewis, to civilisational difference. This article questions responses to the 'clash of civilisations' thesis which seem to accept the postulates on which it is based. It suggests that while dialogue is an indispensable tool of social cohesion, the source of many of the problems that pose a continuing threat to regional and global order is not 'civilisational difference' but the failure of governments to comply with international laws and conventions they have sworn to uphold. The explanation that 'civilisational difference' is the root cause of global disorder allows them to sidestep responsibility for the consequences of their own policies. Manipulation of the United Nations at the level of the Security Council is further evidence that the answer to global problems lies in redressing the failings of an entrenched world system that is based far more on power and state perceptions of self-interest than justice. The clearest evidence of structural weakness in the international system is to be found in the Middle East, where the UN Secretary-General's former special representative to the 'peace process', Alvaro de Soto, has drawn attention to the disjunction between public declarations of good intentions and high-level manipulation of this 'process' by powerful actors from behind the scenes. The article concludes that where dialogue is not the problem, it cannot be the solution.
      Keywords
      Civilization
      International law
      International relations
      Peace process
      Perception
      Political system
      United Nations
      Asia
      Eurasia
      Middle East
      Permalink
      http://hdl.handle.net/11693/23097
      Published Version (Please cite this version)
      http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01436590802052599
      Collections
      • Department of Political Science and Public Administration 525

      Browse

      All of BUIRCommunities & CollectionsTitlesAuthorsAdvisorsBy Issue DateKeywordsTypeDepartmentsThis CollectionTitlesAuthorsAdvisorsBy Issue DateKeywordsTypeDepartments

      My Account

      Login

      Statistics

      View Usage Statistics

      Bilkent University

      If you have trouble accessing this page and need to request an alternate format, contact the site administrator. Phone: (312) 290 1771
      Copyright © Bilkent University | Library IT

      Contact Us | Send Feedback | Off-Campus Access | Admin