dc.contributor.author Sahin, E. en_US dc.contributor.author Onural, L. en_US dc.date.accessioned 2016-02-08T10:00:07Z dc.date.available 2016-02-08T10:00:07Z dc.date.issued 2013-07-18 en_US dc.identifier.issn 1368-2199 dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/11693/22440 dc.description.abstract Light field representation is a model for three-dimensional (3D) image representation and integral imaging is an optical 3D imaging and representation method. A comparative investigation of light field representation and integral imaging is given in this paper. The practical integral imaging is shown to be equivalent to the discrete light field representation if some restrictions are imposed on the light field. On the other hand, it is shown that the integral imaging is not equivalent to the continuous light field representation. In any case, physical realisation of an arbitrary abstract light field representation may not be possible due to restrictions associated with the uncertainty principle related to the spatial and angular resolutions. en_US dc.language.iso English en_US dc.source.title The Imaging Science Journal en_US dc.relation.isversionof http://dx.doi.org/10.1179/136821909X12581187859817 en_US dc.subject Integral imaging en_US dc.subject Light field representation en_US dc.title A comparative study of light field representation and integral imaging en_US dc.type Article en_US dc.department Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering en_US dc.citation.spage 28 en_US dc.citation.epage 31 en_US dc.citation.volumeNumber 58 en_US dc.citation.issueNumber 1 en_US dc.identifier.doi 10.1179/136821909X12581187859817 en_US dc.publisher Taylor and Francis en_US dc.identifier.eissn 1743-131X
﻿