Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSahin, E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorOnural, L.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2016-02-08T10:00:07Z
dc.date.available2016-02-08T10:00:07Z
dc.date.issued2013-07-18en_US
dc.identifier.issn1368-2199
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11693/22440
dc.description.abstractLight field representation is a model for three-dimensional (3D) image representation and integral imaging is an optical 3D imaging and representation method. A comparative investigation of light field representation and integral imaging is given in this paper. The practical integral imaging is shown to be equivalent to the discrete light field representation if some restrictions are imposed on the light field. On the other hand, it is shown that the integral imaging is not equivalent to the continuous light field representation. In any case, physical realisation of an arbitrary abstract light field representation may not be possible due to restrictions associated with the uncertainty principle related to the spatial and angular resolutions.en_US
dc.language.isoEnglishen_US
dc.source.titleThe Imaging Science Journalen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1179/136821909X12581187859817en_US
dc.subjectIntegral imagingen_US
dc.subjectLight field representationen_US
dc.titleA comparative study of light field representation and integral imagingen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.departmentDepartment of Electrical and Electronics Engineeringen_US
dc.citation.spage28en_US
dc.citation.epage31en_US
dc.citation.volumeNumber58en_US
dc.citation.issueNumber1en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1179/136821909X12581187859817en_US
dc.publisherTaylor and Francisen_US
dc.identifier.eissn1743-131X


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record