• About
  • Policies
  • What is openaccess
  • Library
  • Contact
Advanced search
      View Item 
      •   BUIR Home
      • Scholarly Publications
      • Faculty of Humanities and Letters
      • Department of Philosophy
      • View Item
      •   BUIR Home
      • Scholarly Publications
      • Faculty of Humanities and Letters
      • Department of Philosophy
      • View Item
      JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

      War crimes and expressive theories of punishment: Communication or denunciation?

      Thumbnail
      View / Download
      169.4 Kb
      Author
      Wringe, B.
      Date
      2010
      Source Title
      Res Publica
      Print ISSN
      1356-4765 (print)
      Publisher
      Springer Netherlands
      Volume
      16
      Issue
      2
      Pages
      119 - 133
      Language
      English
      Type
      Article
      Item Usage Stats
      136
      views
      115
      downloads
      Abstract
      In a paper published in 2006, I argued that the best way of defending something like our current practices of punishing war criminals would be to base the justification of this practice on an expressive theory of punishment. I considered two forms that such a justification could take-a 'denunciatory' account, on which the purpose of punishment is supposed to communicate a commitment to certain kinds of standard to individuals other than the criminal and a 'communicative' account, on which the purpose of the punishment is to communicate with the perpetrator, and argued for a denunciatory account which I developed at some length. In this paper I would like to reconsider the plausibility of a communicative account. One difficulty that such accounts face is that the punishment of war criminals often involves the inflicting of harsh treatment on them by individuals who are members of states other than their own. On a communicative account this is problematic: on such an account-or at least on the version of it proposed by Duff (2000)-it is essential that those who are punish and those who punish them belong to a single community. When this requirement is not satisfied harsh treatment does not constitute punishment. Duff has argued that the problem can be solved by regarding all human beings as members of a single moral community: here I argue that this suggestion is unsatisfactory and propose an alternative. One consequence of my account is that if it is correct there may limitations on the range of kinds of war criminal that can legitimately be punished by international tribunals. © 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
      Keywords
      Communication
      Expressive theory of punishment
      Punishment
      War crimes
      Permalink
      http://hdl.handle.net/11693/22331
      Published Version (Please cite this version)
      https://doi.org/10.1007/s11158-010-9115-1
      Collections
      • Department of Philosophy 182
      Show full item record

      Browse

      All of BUIRCommunities & CollectionsTitlesAuthorsAdvisorsBy Issue DateKeywordsTypeDepartmentsThis CollectionTitlesAuthorsAdvisorsBy Issue DateKeywordsTypeDepartments

      My Account

      Login

      Statistics

      View Usage StatisticsView Google Analytics Statistics

      Bilkent University

      If you have trouble accessing this page and need to request an alternate format, contact the site administrator. Phone: (312) 290 1771
      Copyright © Bilkent University - Library IT

      Contact Us | Send Feedback | Off-Campus Access | Admin | Privacy