Reichenbach and Weyl on apriority and mathematical applicability
63 - 77
MetadataShow full item record
Please cite this item using this persistent URLhttp://hdl.handle.net/11693/21869
I examine Reichenbach's theory of relative a priori and Michael Friedman's interpretation of it. I argue that Reichenbach's view remains at bottom conventionalist and that one issue which separates Reichenbach's account from Kant's apriorism is the problem of mathematical applicability. I then discuss Hermann Weyl's theory of blank forms which in many ways runs parallel to the theory of relative a priori. I argue that it is capable of dealing with the problem of applicability, but with a cost. © 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
- Research Paper 7144