Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWringe, B.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2016-02-08T09:51:48Z
dc.date.available2016-02-08T09:51:48Z
dc.date.issued2015en_US
dc.identifier.issn1386-2820
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11693/21837
dc.description.abstractWhen Dominique Strauss-Kahn, then head of the IMF, was arrested on charges of sexual assault arising from events that were alleged to have occurred during his stay in an up-market hotel in New York, a sizeable portion of French public opinion was outraged - not by the possibility that a well-connected and widely-admired politician had assaulted an immigrant hotel worker, but by the way in which the accused had been treated by the American authorities. I shall argue that in one relatively minor respect, Strauss-Kahn’s defenders were correct. They were correct to argue that the parading of Strauss-Kahn before the press, in handcuffs - the so-called perp walk - constituted a form of punishment; and thus that it contravened the principle that criminal punishments should only be administered after a fair trial. So-called ‘expressive’ theorists of punishment hold that a form of harsh treatment can only constitute a form of punishment if it has an expressive role. Within the expressive family, we can distinguish between views on which the primary target of the communication to be the society of which either offender, or victim, or both are members—what I call ‘Denunciatory Views’, and views which take the principle target of penal communication to be the offender—such as Antony Duff’s Communicative View. I shall argue that on both a minimal account of punishment and on either kind of expressive view, ‘perp walks’ are a form of punishment.en_US
dc.language.isoEnglishen_US
dc.source.titleEthical Theory and Moral Practiceen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10677-014-9545-5en_US
dc.subjectAntony Duffen_US
dc.subjectCommunicative theoriesen_US
dc.subjectPerp walksen_US
dc.subjectPunishmenten_US
dc.titlePerp walks as punishmenten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.departmentDepartment of Philosophyen_US
dc.citation.spage615en_US
dc.citation.epage629en_US
dc.citation.volumeNumber18en_US
dc.citation.issueNumber3en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10677-014-9545-5en_US
dc.publisherKluwer Academic Publishersen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record