The incoherence of strong popular sovereignty
Author
Vinx, L.
Date
2013Source Title
International Journal of Constitutional Law
Print ISSN
1474-2640
Electronic ISSN
1474-2659
Publisher
Oxford University Press
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
101 - 124
Language
English
Type
ArticleItem Usage Stats
115
views
views
146
downloads
downloads
Abstract
This paper argues that the strong conception of popular sovereignty employed in the German Federal Constitutional Court's recent decision on the Treaty of Lisbon is incoherent and should not be used as the centerpiece of a democratic constitutional theory. Strong conceptions of popular sovereignty are usually defended on the basis of the claim that an appeal to strong popular sovereignty is necessary to ground the legitimacy of constitutional law. In fact, strong conceptions of popular sovereignty eliminate the conceptual space for the idea of legitimate law. This thesis is developed through a critical discussion of Carl Schmitt's constitutional theory-which appears to be the main inspiration behind contemporary arguments for strong popular sovereignty-as well as through an analysis of the Lisbon decision of the Bundesverfassungsgericht.