Security first approach : causes of security prioritization and implication of this prioritization on democracy in the cases of Singapore and Azerbaijan
Author(s)
Advisor
Aydınlı, ErselDate
2009Publisher
Bilkent University
Language
English
Type
ThesisItem Usage Stats
171
views
views
96
downloads
downloads
Abstract
The security-democracy relationship is an interesting issue that has drawn
scholarly attention. The security first approach is a new input in the field. It looks
the issue from the Western foreign policy perspective and discusses what should
be done by Western powers in the failed and rogue states to build security and
democracy. It claims that first security must be established, and then democracy
would gradually consolidate, rather than democracy promotion. Such a shift in
Western foreign policy would have significant impact for the developing world,
facing the challenge of political-economic development and security-democracy
building at the same time. This thesis aims to apply security first approach to
developing world. It analyzes the causes of security prioritization and implications
of this prioritization on democracy, in the cases of Singapore and Azerbaijan to
verify the security first approach’s claims. Both of these countries have applied a
security first approach after they gained independence. They have also established
some democratic institutional and legal structures. However, the worry of the
ruling elites about losing security and power led them constantly delay
democratization and restrict political arena. The governments of both cases have
been successful in maintaining security and stability, yet this did not give way to
the gradual triumph of democracy as argued by security first approach. Western
cooperation with the governments of these countries, due to the formers’ interest
in the stability of both countries and regimes can be argued to have contributed to
the security of the states and their ruling elites, but not to the democratization
process and the security of the people. Hence, the thesis argues that the discussion
in the Western foreign policy should not be about security versus democracy, but
rather about striving for security and democracy concurrently in the developing
world.