The impact of regime-type on health: does redistribution explain everything?
Cambridge University Press
647 - 677
Item Usage Stats
Many scholars claim that democracy improves population health. The prevailing explanation for this is that democratic regimes distribute health-promoting resources more widely than autocratic regimes. The central contention of this article is that democracies also have a significant pro-health effect regardless of public redistributive policies. After establishing the theoretical plausibility of the nondistributive effect, a panel of 153 countries for the years 1972 to 2000 is used to examine the relationship between extent of democratic experience and life expectancy. The authors find that democratic governance continues to have a salutary effect on population health even when controls are introduced for the distribution of health-enhancing resources. Data for fifty autocratic countries for the years 1994 to 2007 are then used to examine whether media freedom-independent of government responsiveness-has a positive impact on life expectancy.
Ethnic And Racial Groups
Health Care Policy
Published Version (Please cite this version)http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0043887111000177
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Wigley, S. (Elsevier Ltd, 2017)There is now an extensive literature on the adverse effect of petroleum wealth on the political, economic and social well-being of a country. In this study we examine whether the so-called resource curse extends to the ...
Cindoglu, D.; Cengiz, F. S. (Taylor & Francis Inc., 2010)In this article, we explore the increasing medicalization of birth and the surge in Caesarean sections in order to examine how this phenomenon relates to the dominant modernization discourse on women's lives in contemporary ...