• About
  • Policies
  • What is openaccess
  • Library
  • Contact
Advanced search
      View Item 
      •   BUIR Home
      • Scholarly Publications
      • Faculty of Business Administration
      • Department of Management
      • View Item
      •   BUIR Home
      • Scholarly Publications
      • Faculty of Business Administration
      • Department of Management
      • View Item
      JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

      Comments on effective forecasting and judgmental adjustments: an empirical evaluation and strategies for improvement in supply-chain planning

      Thumbnail
      View/Open
      Full printable version (360.8Kb)
      Author
      Önkal, D.
      Date
      2009
      Journal Title
      International Journal of Forecasting
      ISSN
      0169-2070
      Publisher
      Elsevier
      Volume
      25
      Issue
      1
      Pages
      30 - 31
      Language
      English
      Type
      Article
      Metadata
      Show full item record
      Please cite this item using this persistent URL
      http://hdl.handle.net/11693/11647
      Abstract
      Demand forecasting is a crucial aspect of the planning process in supply-chain companies. The most common approach to forecasting demand in these companies involves the use of a computerized forecasting system to produce initial forecasts and the subsequent judgmental adjustment of these forecasts by the company's demand planners, ostensibly to take into account exceptional circumstances expected over the planning horizon. Making these adjustments can involve considerable management effort and time, but do they improve accuracy, and are some types of adjustment more effective than others? To investigate this, we collected data on more than 60,000 forecasts and outcomes from four supply-chain companies. In three of the companies, on average, judgmental adjustments increased accuracy. However, a detailed analysis revealed that, while the relatively larger adjustments tended to lead to greater average improvements in accuracy, the smaller adjustments often damaged accuracy. In addition, positive adjustments, which involved adjusting the forecast upwards, were much less likely to improve accuracy than negative adjustments. They were also made in the wrong direction more frequently, suggesting a general bias towards optimism. Models were then developed to eradicate such biases. Based on both this statistical analysis and organisational observation, the paper goes on to analyse strategies designed to enhance the effectiveness of judgmental adjustments directly.
      Published as
      http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2008.09.003
      Collections
      • Department of Management 446

      Browse

      All of BUIRCommunities & CollectionsTitlesAuthorsAdvisorsBy Issue DateKeywordsTypeDepartmentsThis CollectionTitlesAuthorsAdvisorsBy Issue DateKeywordsTypeDepartments

      My Account

      Login

      Statistics

      View Usage Statistics

      Bilkent University

      If you have trouble accessing this page and need to request an alternate format, contact the webmaster. Phone: (312) 290 1771
      Copyright © Bilkent University | Library IT

      Contact Us | Send Feedback | Off-Campus Access | Admin