Kerman, KaanAngela, R.Antonio, R.Claudia, P.2025-02-272024-03-122025-02-272025-01-050289-0771https://hdl.handle.net/11693/114572.2In this article Table 3 caption was incorrectly given as ‘Parameter estimates of the main mixed effect models for O. ruficapillus and O. furcatus. Behavioral measures are factored as response variables and transformed prior to analysis sex, body size, and the interaction term are con sidered as fixed effects in the model. Individual identity is used as a random effect. Fixed effects are scaled for easier comparison between models. Standardized coefficients (β) are reported with 95% confidence intervals. Significant esti mates are given in bold.’ The correct caption should have read ‘Parameter estimates of the main mixed effect models for O. ruficapillus and O. furcatus. Behavioral measures are factored as response variables and transformed prior to analysis sex, body size, and the interaction term are con sidered as fixed effects in the model. Individual identity is used as a random effect. Fixed effects are scaled for easier comparison between models. Unstandardized coefficients (β) are reported with 95% confidence intervals. Significant estimates are given in bold.’ The original article has been corrected.EnglishCC BY 4.0 DEED (Attribution 4.0 International)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Sexual horn dimorphismAnimal personalityActivityLocomotory speedDistance movedDung beetlesOnthophagus furcatusOnthophagus ruficapillusCorrection to: Sexual horn dimorphism predicts the expression of active personality trait: males perform better only in the sexually horn dimorphic Onthophagus dung beetleArticle10.1007/s10164-024-00834-41439-5444