Turan, G.2018-04-122018-04-1220170958-9236http://hdl.handle.net/11693/37200Despite the spectacular development in the field of international criminal law, critical feminism stresses the narrow scope of the sex and gender crimes in the Rome Statute establishing the first permanent International Criminal Court. The current international criminal law discourse, as expressed by recent case law, is geared towards the protection of certain groups targeted on account of their distinctiveness within the framework of a conflict situation, and gender is not recognized as one of these group identities. The question whether international criminal law on sexual violence applies only to inter-group conflicts brings to the fore an uneasy likelihood of exclusion of some recently emergent situations where identities of the conflicting parties transcend a particular ethnicity or nationality, and where victims of sexual violence belong to the same group as their perpetrators. The article argues that, rather than the Rome Statute or newly introduced rules and regulations, a significant obstacle in developing gender justice is the narrow interpretation of sexual violence to inter-group hostilities. © 2016 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.Englishgender crimesGender justiceInternational Criminal CourtInternational criminal lawSexual violenceConflictCourtCrimeCriminal lawEthnicityFeminismGenderHostilityHumanIdentityJusticeOffenderSexual violenceStressVctimArticle10.1080/09589236.2016.1155977