Ahmed, Nashiha2020-06-242020-06-242020-062020-062020-06-23http://hdl.handle.net/11693/53666Cataloged from PDF version of article.Includes bibliographical references (leaves 39- 43).The advancement of artificial intelligence suggests signs of computational creativity; however, the case for computational creativity is undermined by an anthropocentric bias. In this thesis, I attempt to broaden the theory of creativity in artificial intelligence by drawing observations from examples of non-human animal creativity. I also illustrate how this works in parallel with the 4E cognition theory. I conclude that addressing the underlying anthropocentric bias in evaluation of creativity in this way (1) allows a stronger case for computational creativity and (2) develops a more informed theory of creativity.iv, 43 leaves ; 30 cm.Englishinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess4ECognitionAnimal creativityArtificial IntelligenceBodenComputational creativityThesisB160318