Hadley, John2019-06-122019-06-122019-052019-052019-06-11http://hdl.handle.net/11693/52015Cataloged from PDF version of article.Includes bibliographical references (leaves 38-39).Philosopher and historian R.G. Collingwood made bold claims for the role imagination plays in the study of history, but does not adequately qualify his claims. In this thesis I add content to Collingwood’s conception of historical imagination by using Collingwood’s works to inter-illuminate each other and by incorporating more thought on imagination and history that has been written since Collingwood. I conclude that there are three types of imagination relevant to a Collingwoodian historian: inquisitive, instructive, and representative imagination.iv, 39 leaves ; 30 cm.Englishinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCollingwoodHistoriographyImaginationRe-enactmentSimulationImagination in the study of history: Collingwood reconsideredTarih çalışmalarında hayal gücü: Collingwood'un yeniden incelenmesiThesisB131355