Mouratidis, A.Michou, AikateriniDemircioğlu, A. N.Sayıl, M.2019-02-212019-02-2120181041-6080http://hdl.handle.net/11693/49920In this study, we aimed to investigate the different routes through which perceived goal structures, and in turn mastery-approach and performance-approach goals in mathematics, predict subsequent academic performance. Path analyses with a sample of Turkish adolescents (N = 369; 49.1% males; Mage = 16.67 years, SD = 1.85) revealed two distinct paths. After controlling for mid-year grades, we found perceived mastery goal structures to relate (positively) to mastery-approach goals, which in turn positively predicted end-year grades through challenge seeking. In contrast, perceived performance goal structures related positively to both performance-approach and performance-avoidance goals with the former directly predicting higher end-year grades, and the latter being related negatively to challenge seeking. These findings imply that there may exist different paths that can predict academic performance.EnglishAcademic performanceAchievement goalsAdolescenceChallenge seekingLearning environmentMathematicsDifferent goals, different pathways to success: Performance-approach goals as direct and mastery-approach goals as indirect predictors of grades in mathematicsArticle10.1016/j.lindif.2017.11.017