Önkal D.Yates, J. F.Simga‐Mugan, C.Öztin, Ş.2016-02-082016-02-0820030749-5978http://hdl.handle.net/11693/24464Highly knowledgeable people often fail to achieve highly accurate judgments, a phenomenon sometimes called the "process-performance paradox." The present research tested for this paradox in foreign exchange (FX) rate forecasting. Forty professional and 57 sophisticated amateur forecasters made one-day and one-week-ahead FX predictions in deterministic and probabilistic formats. Among the conclusions indicated by the results are: (a) professional accuracy usually surpasses amateur accuracy, although many amateurs outperform many professionals; (b) professionals appear to achieve high proficiency via heavy reliance on predictive information (unlike what has been observed before, e.g., for stock prices); (c) forecast format strongly affects judgment accuracy and processes; and (d) apparent overconfidence can transform itself into underconfidence depending on when and how forecasters must articulate their confidence.EnglishProfessional vs. amateur judgment accuracy: the case of foreign exchange ratesArticle10.1016/S0749-5978(03)00058-X1095-9920