dc.contributor.advisor | Gates, Marie-Henriette | |
dc.contributor.author | Baskın, Sena | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-03-16T12:30:10Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-03-16T12:30:10Z | |
dc.date.copyright | 2022-03 | |
dc.date.issued | 2022-03 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2022-03-15 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11693/77762 | |
dc.description | Cataloged from PDF version of article. | en_US |
dc.description | Thesis (Master's): Bilkent University, Department of Archaeology, İhsan Doğramacı Bilkent University, 2022. | en_US |
dc.description | Includes bibliographical references (leaves 131-138). | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | This project examines the LBA I ceramics from Kinet Höyük Period 15 contexts,
which are marked by the introduction of Hittite material culture. It aims to understand
to what extent ceramic production in Kinet follows the norms of Hittite pottery
tradition.
Chapter I introduces the site of Kinet Höyük, elaborates on archaeological contexts
and reviews the historical narrations about the Hittite involvement in Kizzuwatna.
Period 15 ceramics were unearthed from the partly exposed official building in
trenches J/L, E/H, and C on the mound and Sounding R from LBA lower city.
Chapter II engages in scholarly discussions and recent trends in ceramic studies in
Hittite archaeology, alongside theoretical and methodological discussions about
ceramic standardization in archaeological theory. Further, it examines written sources about pottery, potters, and crafts organization in the Hittite Kingdom. Chapter III and
IV present material examination of ceramics regarding fabric, forms, production
techniques and potmark applications.
Chapter V compares Kinet Period 15 ceramics with the ceramics from central
Anatolia and Cilicia. Statistical comparison with Hattusa ceramics from the recent
excavations (Schoop, 2006; 2011; Gruber, 2017) and visual comparison focusing on
forms, fabric, and production techniques with central Anatolia and Cilicia yield
significant results. Firstly, fabric and forms from the Hittite ceramic repertoire
dominate the Kinet Period 15 assemblage. Significantly, however, different functional
vessel categories show different degrees of cross-regional standardization. For
example, food preparation and serving vessels are statistically and visually very
comparable with Hattusa ceramics. Nonetheless, cooking vessels show variation in
form frequency and metrical parameters. | en_US |
dc.description.statementofresponsibility | by Sena Baskın | en_US |
dc.format.extent | xxix, 441 leaves : illustrations, charts, tables, graphics ; 30 cm. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | English | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | Kinet Höyük | en_US |
dc.subject | Late Bronze Age | en_US |
dc.subject | Cilicia | en_US |
dc.subject | Hittite pottery | en_US |
dc.subject | Ceramic standardization | en_US |
dc.title | LBA I ceramics from Kinet Höyük Period 15 a statistical assessment of the cross-regional standardization of Hittite ceramics in Late Bronze Age Anatolia | en_US |
dc.title.alternative | Kinet Höyük katman 15, GTÇ I seramikleri Geç Tunç Çağı Anadolusunda Hitit seramiğinin bölgeler arası standardizasyonunun istatistiksel bir değerlendirmesi | en_US |
dc.type | Thesis | en_US |
dc.department | Department of Archaeology | en_US |
dc.publisher | Bilkent University | en_US |
dc.description.degree | M.A. | en_US |
dc.identifier.itemid | B160839 | |