Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorÖzcan, Burcu Şenyapılı
dc.contributor.authorKınayoğlu, Gökhan
dc.date.accessioned2017-09-25T13:47:52Z
dc.date.available2017-09-25T13:47:52Z
dc.date.copyright2017-09
dc.date.issued2017-09
dc.date.submitted2017-09-25
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11693/33731
dc.descriptionCataloged from PDF version of article.en_US
dc.descriptionThesis (Ph.D.): Bilkent University, Department of Interior Architecture and Environmental Design, İhsan Doğramacı Bilkent University, 2017.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (leaves 129-143).en_US
dc.description.abstractThis thesis formulates its research through a two‐fold approach: it introduces a novel algorithm, but first it establishes the relationship model through which the assessment of the algorithm should be made. It discusses the intrinsic relation of “form” and “part” in architecture, through the analysis of concepts “standard” and “non‐standard.” The form is the overall shape of an object and part is the numerous constituents of form. “Standard” ‐which is a central trait for architecture‐ and “nonstandard” ‐a later introduction to architecture‐ consisting of various formal alternatives, are included for their important formal and constructional characteristics. All four concepts are studied in their historical contexts and in relation to secondary themes, like tectonics, mass‐production, and masscustomization. Simple essential techniques and various geometric formations in architecture are also covered through built examples to further demonstrate the aspects of “standard” and “non‐standard,” in terms of “form” and “part.” Based on these four concepts, a quadripartite relation is established. The relationship model formulates a significant interpretation and interrelation of the four concepts, hence creates an analytical framework. Through the findings of the quadripartite relation’s last partition, an algorithm is devised. The algorithm can generate various alternative infrastructure models for surfaces of revolution through several parameters. The findings demonstrate essential advantages in terms of standardization, material use, simplicity and ease of assembly. The algorithm can be altered slightly to adapt to other three partitions.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Gökhan Kınayoğlu.en_US
dc.format.extentxi, 148 leaves : charts (some color) ; 30 cm.en_US
dc.language.isoEnglishen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectAlgorithmen_US
dc.subjectComputer‐aided designen_US
dc.subjectNon‐standarden_US
dc.subjectStandarden_US
dc.subjectTechniqueen_US
dc.titleForm and part through standard / non‐standard dualityen_US
dc.title.alternativeStandart / standart‐olmayan ikilemi üzerinden bütün ve parçaen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.departmentDepartment of Interior Architecture and Environmental Designen_US
dc.publisherBilkent Universityen_US
dc.description.degreePh. D.en_US
dc.identifier.itemidB156498
dc.embargo.release2018-09-25


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record