dc.contributor.advisor | Aydınlı, Ersel | |
dc.contributor.author | Yılmaz, Yasemin | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-09-07T13:29:48Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-09-07T13:29:48Z | |
dc.date.copyright | 2017-07 | |
dc.date.issued | 2017-07 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2017-09-06 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11693/33577 | |
dc.description | Cataloged from PDF version of article. | en_US |
dc.description | Thesis (M.S.): Bilkent University, Department of International Relations, İhsan Doğramacı Bilkent University, 2017. | en_US |
dc.description | Includes bibliographical references (leaves 216-238). | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | There is a complex web of alliances formed against a range of actors from states to
NSAs and diversified agenda of threats from statist to non-statist. This thesis aims to
explore the changing nature of alliances in light of the increased role of VNSAs by
challenging Walt’s balance of threat theory. The Turkish-American alliance is
selected to demonstrate non-statist threats’ impacts on alliance cohesion. This thesis
argues that concurrence/divergence of threat perception and threat management
between two allies affects the degree of cohesion as high or low. In this regard, I aim
to find an answer to this research question: How have the evolving Turkish and
American perceptions of the PKK/PYD affected the alliance cohesion between
Turkey and the US? I will analyze the historical period from 1952 to 2017, dividedby
the Kobane siege, using a single-longitudinal case study method. I observe that certain Kurdish entities have become the “Achilles heel” of this partnership and
constitute the major challenge for the cohesiveness of the alliance. The rise of
Kurdish capabilities in the region against ISIS has led the US to ally with the
PYD/YPG as the ground force of choice. This choice has forced apart the two allies
by decreasing the cohesiveness of the alliance and given way to a kind of “veiled
trilateral relationship” among the US, Turkey and the PYD/YPG. This outcome
demonstrates how “diverse-actored” alliances can be formed simultaneously to
balance against different external threats contrary to the “state to state” origin of BoT
theory. | en_US |
dc.description.statementofresponsibility | by Yasemin Yılmaz. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | xv, 238 leaves : charts ; 30 cm | en_US |
dc.language.iso | English | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | Alliance cohesion | en_US |
dc.subject | Balance-of-Threat Theory | en_US |
dc.subject | Non-statist threats | en_US |
dc.subject | Turkey | en_US |
dc.subject | US | en_US |
dc.title | The impacts of non-statist threats on alliance cohesion : Turkish-American case | en_US |
dc.title.alternative | Devlet-dışı tehditlerin ittifakın uyumuna (kohezyonuna) etkisi : Türk-Amerikan ittifakı | en_US |
dc.type | Thesis | en_US |
dc.department | Department of International Relations | en_US |
dc.publisher | Bilkent University | en_US |
dc.description.degree | M.S. | en_US |
dc.identifier.itemid | B125670 | |