Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorAydınlı, Erselen_US
dc.contributor.authorYılmaz, Yaseminen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-09-07T13:29:48Z
dc.date.available2017-09-07T13:29:48Z
dc.date.copyright2017-07
dc.date.issued2017-09
dc.date.submitted2017-09-06
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11693/33577
dc.descriptionCataloged from PDF version of article.en_US
dc.descriptionThesis (M.S.): Bilkent University, Department of International Relations, İhsan Doğramacı Bilkent University, 2017.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (leaves 216-238).en_US
dc.description.abstractThere is a complex web of alliances formed against a range of actors from states to NSAs and diversified agenda of threats from statist to non-statist. This thesis aims to explore the changing nature of alliances in light of the increased role of VNSAs by challenging Walt’s balance of threat theory. The Turkish-American alliance is selected to demonstrate non-statist threats’ impacts on alliance cohesion. This thesis argues that concurrence/divergence of threat perception and threat management between two allies affects the degree of cohesion as high or low. In this regard, I aim to find an answer to this research question: How have the evolving Turkish and American perceptions of the PKK/PYD affected the alliance cohesion between Turkey and the US? I will analyze the historical period from 1952 to 2017, dividedby the Kobane siege, using a single-longitudinal case study method. I observe that certain Kurdish entities have become the “Achilles heel” of this partnership and constitute the major challenge for the cohesiveness of the alliance. The rise of Kurdish capabilities in the region against ISIS has led the US to ally with the PYD/YPG as the ground force of choice. This choice has forced apart the two allies by decreasing the cohesiveness of the alliance and given way to a kind of “veiled trilateral relationship” among the US, Turkey and the PYD/YPG. This outcome demonstrates how “diverse-actored” alliances can be formed simultaneously to balance against different external threats contrary to the “state to state” origin of BoT theory.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Yasemin Yılmaz.en_US
dc.format.extentxv, 238 leaves : charts ; 30 cmen_US
dc.language.isoEnglishen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectAlliance cohesionen_US
dc.subjectBalance-of-Threat Theoryen_US
dc.subjectNon-statist threatsen_US
dc.subjectTurkeyen_US
dc.subjectUSen_US
dc.titleThe impacts of non-statist threats on alliance cohesion : Turkish-American caseen_US
dc.title.alternativeDevlet-dışı tehditlerin ittifakın uyumuna (kohezyonuna) etkisi : Türk-Amerikan ittifakıen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.departmentDepartment of International Relationsen_US
dc.publisherBilkent Universityen_US
dc.description.degreeM.S.en_US
dc.identifier.itemidB125670


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record