Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBarshan, B.en_US
dc.contributor.authorAyrulu, B.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2016-02-08T10:44:33Z
dc.date.available2016-02-08T10:44:33Z
dc.date.issued1998-08-06en_US
dc.identifier.issn0013-5194
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11693/25430
dc.description.abstractPerformances of four methods of time-of-flight estimation for sonar signals are compared in terms of their bias, standard deviation and complexity: thresholding, curve fitting, m-out-of-N sliding-window, and correlation detection. Whereas correlation detection represents the theoretical optimum, simpler and faster suboptimal methods can offer acceptable performance at much lower cost. The experimental results are in close agreement with the simulations.en_US
dc.language.isoEnglishen_US
dc.source.titleElectronics Lettersen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1049/el:19981127en_US
dc.subjectComputer simulationen_US
dc.subjectCorrelation theoryen_US
dc.subjectSignal filtering and predictionen_US
dc.subjectSignal to noise ratioen_US
dc.subjectTime-of-flight estimationen_US
dc.subjectSonaren_US
dc.titlePerformance comparison of four time-of-flight estimation methods for sonar signalsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.departmentDepartment of Electrical and Electronics Engineeringen_US
dc.citation.spage1616en_US
dc.citation.epage1617en_US
dc.citation.volumeNumber34en_US
dc.citation.issueNumber16en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1049/el:19981127en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record