Instructors' perceptions of the content validity of the English language exams at Niğde University
Author(s)
Advisor
Snyder, William E.Date
2001Publisher
Bilkent University
Language
English
Type
ThesisItem Usage Stats
136
views
views
68
downloads
downloads
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to find out the teachers’ perceptions of
whether the content of the tests items reflect the content of the coursebook and
their teaching. An equally important purpose is to find out whether the instructors
follow the coursebook content in their teaching.
This study attempted to find out these research questions:
1. Are there any significant differences among Niğde University English
Instructors in terms of whether they think final test items reflect the content of the
coursebook?
2. Are there any significant differences among Niğde University English
Instructors in terms of whether they think final test items reflect their teaching?
3. What is the relationship between teachers’ perceptions of the relationship of the
tests to the content of the coursebook and their teaching?
Data was collected from sixteen English teachers of Niğde University
through a questionnaire which was consist of 40 test items chosen randomly
among five final English tests which were taken from English instructors.
To analyse the results of the questionnaire, quantitative analysis methods
were used in this study. Chi-square statistical analysis was used to analyse the
data.
The results of the first research question indicate that instructors generally
think the test items reflect the content of the coursebook they use. In other words
the instructors feel the tests have content validity. Results of the second research
question show that instructors generally think that the test items reflect their
teaching. The results of the third research question indicate that instructors follow
the coursebook content in their teaching.
A further examination of the test items indicates that there are 13
problematic items within the tests. The categories of these problematic items are :
multiple correct answers, response cues, no correct answer, number of options,
and translation.
There are some precautions that can be taken in order to reduce the
number of problematic items in the tests. One of them is peer review which
instructors check each other’s tests. An in-service training may be very useful for
the instructors on testing and it may be a good solution of raising the content
validity of the tests.